Automatic test system with synchronized instruments

ABSTRACT

A test system with multiple instruments. Some instruments act as controller instruments and others act as controlled instruments. Each instrument includes a clock generator that synthesizes one or more local clocks from a reference clock. The reference clock is a relatively low frequency clock that can be inexpensively but accurately generated and distributed to all of the instruments. A communication link between instruments is provided. Timing circuits within instruments that are to exchange time information are synchronized to establish a common time reference. Thereafter, instruments communicate time dependent commands or status messages asynchronously over the communication link by appending to each message a time stamp reflecting a time expressed relative to the common time reference. The test system includes digital instruments that contain pattern generators that send command messages to analog instruments, which need not include pattern generators. The architecture simplifies design of analog instruments and avoids redesign of analog instrument as pattern rates of digital instruments change.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. § 119(e) to U.S.Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/630,111, entitled “INSTRUMENTSYNCHRONIZATION FOR AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT,” filed on Nov. 22, 2004,which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety.

This case is related to “INSTRUMENT WITH INTERFACE FOR SYNCHRONIZATIONIN AUTOMATIC TEST EQUIPMENT,” filed Feb. 22, 2005, which is incorporatedby reference herein in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates generally to automatic test equipment and moreparticularly to control of instruments within a test system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Semiconductor devices are tested, often multiple times, during theirmanufacture. A piece of automatic test equipment, referred to as a“tester,” is used to generate test signals that stimulate a device undertest (DUT) and to measure the response. The tester determines whether aDUT is operating properly by comparing the response evoked by acarefully controlled test pattern with an expected response.

To fully test devices, the tester should generate and measure signalssuch as may be found in the operating environment of those devices.Increasing complexity of semiconductor chips has required that automatictest equipment also generate and measure more complex signals. Mostsemiconductor devices generate or respond to high speed digital signals.Many devices, such as disk drive controllers and processors for videosignals, also generate or respond to analog signals. Entire systems,containing both analog and digital electronics, are now widelyimplemented on single semiconductor devices.

Automatic test equipment must now generate both digital and analogsignals. Accordingly, test equipment is typically made to containmultiple instruments. Each instrument performs a specific function, suchas generating high speed digital signals or producing an analog waveformthat has a programmed characteristic. Multiple instruments are installedin a tester to provide the combination of analog and digital signalsneeded to test a particular device. Creating instruments that provideseparate test functions provides a flexible way to create a test systemthat can generate and measure a set of test signals required for testingvirtually any semiconductor device.

However, assembling a test system from separate instruments creates anadditional challenge for test system designers because the actions ofthe various instruments must be coordinated. For a test system toproperly evaluate test results on a semiconductor device, it is oftennecessary for the tester to determine both that a specific signal wasdetected and that the signal occurred at a specific time in relation toa certain stimulus. Coordinated operation of the instruments isnecessary for signals to be generated and measured with specific timerelationships.

One way to coordinate instruments is to provide centralized circuitrythat provides a reference clock and commands to all instruments. Acircuit in a tester that provides a series of commands to control thegeneration and measurement of test signals is called a “patterngenerator.”

There is often a practical limit to the frequency of a reference clockthat can be reliably fanned out to many instruments in a test system,which can be undesirable. Events that are timed relative to edges of aclock may be specified with a resolution limited by the period of theclock. Lower frequency clocks have longer periods and therefore provideless timing resolution.

Where greater timing resolution is desired, it is known to use an“interpolator.” An interpolator is a circuit that can track an intervalthat is a fraction of a period of a clock. However, interpolators mustbe accurate and stable. Designing and building interpolators in a testsystem therefore presents complexities not present when times aremeasured relative to a digital clock.

A variation on the approach of using a centrally created clockingarchitecture is employed in the Catalyst™ mixed-signal semiconductortest system, manufactured by Teradyne, Inc., of Boston, Mass. Thearchitecture is shown generally in FIG. 1 and includes a reference clockgenerator 8 that generates a clock that is distributed, or fanned out,to a plurality of digital and analog channel cards 10 and 12,respectively. Each analog or digital card may be considered a separateinstrument, though it should be appreciated that an instrument is alogical concept and that an instrument may be implemented on multiplecircuit cards or, alternatively, may be implemented on a single circuitcard along with other circuitry.

Signals generated by a centralized pattern generator 14 are fanned outwith the reference clock to the channel cards. Pattern generator 14issues commands that are to be performed by each instrument. A commandmay be generated for each instrument for each cycle of the referenceclock.

Clock signals for the digital cards are fed to timing circuitry 16,which drives waveform formatting circuitry 18 to produce digital signalsfor application to the device-under-test (DUT, not shown). The analogcards 12, on the other hand, receive the remotely generated digitalreference clock signal and synthesize an analog clock through analogclock module (ACM) 19. The local analog clock A₀ drives functionalcircuitry on one or more analog instruments.

One form of the analog clock is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,188,253,entitled Analog Clock Module, assigned to the assignee of the presentinvention, and expressly incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety. Each analog instrument may have its own clock and thereforeoperate at its own frequency, which could be higher than the frequencyof the reference clock.

In a variation of the design shown in FIG. 1, each instrument includes apattern generator. The pattern generators operate synchronously, basedon the reference clock signal. Each pattern generator outputs commandsor “events” for its specific instrument at the required time.

A further variation is for each instrument to include a local clockgenerator to drive its own pattern generator. The local clock generatormay produce clocks of different frequencies. However, it is necessarythat the pattern generators start in a coordinated fashion.

Published patent application WO/03042710 entitled “CLOCK ARCHITECTUREFOR A FREQUENCY BASED TESTER” (which is hereby incorporated by referencein its entirety) describes a system for coordinating the operation ofpattern generators operating at different frequencies. The approach inthat published application employs a synchronization signal, calledDSYNC, in connection with a reference clock to “align” all of the localclocks at a specific time.

A need exists in the art for a test system in which operation ofmultiple instruments is readily synchronized.

SUMMARY OF INVENTION

In another aspect, the invention relates to a test system of the typehaving a plurality of instruments. The test system includes a referenceclock generator providing a reference clock. A first instrumentcomprises a first local clock generator coupled to the reference clockgenerator and providing a first local clock generated from the referenceclock and a first control circuit storing programmed commands for theplurality of instruments. A second instrument comprises a second localclock generator coupled to the reference clock generator and providing asecond local clock generated from the reference clock; a second controlcircuit having an input and an output, the second control circuitasserting the output at a time specified by a time value provided at theinput to the second control circuit; and functional circuitry having acontrol input coupled to the output of the second control circuit, thefunctional circuitry executing a function in response to a valueasserted at its control input. The test system also has a networkbetween at least the first instrument and the second instrument, thenetwork carrying a message that includes a time value, wherein the firstcontrol circuit is coupled to the network to provide the time value inthe message and the second control circuit is coupled to the network toreceive the time value at its input.

In another aspect, the invention relates to a method of operating a testsystem comprising at least two instruments, the test system furthercomprising a communication link between the at least two instruments.The method comprises establishing a common time reference between timingcircuits in at least two instruments; sequencing on the first instrumentthrough a test pattern defining events in a test, with a portion of theevents to be executed by the first instrument and a portion of theevents to be executed by the second instrument; communicating from thefirst instrument to the second instrument over the communication link tospecify at least one event to be executed by the second instrument and atime at which the event is to be executed; and waiting until thespecified time and executing the specified event with the secondinstrument.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The accompanying drawings are not intended to be drawn to scale. In thedrawings, each identical or nearly identical component that isillustrated in various figures is represented by a like numeral. Forpurposes of clarity, not every component may be labeled in everydrawing. In the drawings:

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a conventional clock architecture for asemiconductor tester;

FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a clock architecture according to one formof the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a simplified block diagram of the clock architecture of FIG.2;

FIG. 4A is a timing diagram illustrating alignment of a local clock;

FIG. 4B is a diagram illustrating synchronization of watches;

FIG. 5 is a block diagram of circuitry interfacing two instruments; and

FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a communication process between twoinstruments.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

This invention is not limited in its application to the details ofconstruction and the arrangement of components set forth in thefollowing description or illustrated in the drawings. The invention iscapable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carriedout in various ways. Also, the phraseology and terminology used hereinis for the purpose of description and should not be regarded aslimiting. The use of “including,” “comprising,” or “having,”“containing,” “involving,” and variations thereof herein, is meant toencompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well asadditional items.

Referring more specifically to FIG. 2, an embodiment of the invention isdescribed in relation to a semiconductor tester, generally designated20, that includes a computer workstation 22, and a testhead 24 (inphantom). The testhead houses a plurality of electronic board assembliesfor generating and measuring test signals, including central card 26,distribution card 28, and multiple instrument cards 30.

As illustrated in FIG. 2, the central card 26 feeds signals todistribution card 28 for distribution to an array of instrument cards30. The central card 26 includes a computer interface 32 that ties theworkstation 22 to the testhead board assemblies, and a reference clockgenerator 34 that generates a reference clock, denoted RCLK. Thereference clock generator may comprise, for example, a 100 MHz crystaloscillator.

Computer interface 32 allows the tester to be interfaced to a computerwork station 22, through which a user may develop test programs that canbe loaded into tester 20. Computer work station 22 provides a user withother capabilities, such as initiating execution of previously developedtest programs or analyzing test results.

The central card 26 includes control circuitry that generates controlsignals responsive to commands from the workstation. One of the controlsignals comprises a “DSYNC” signal. The reference clock signal and theDSYNC signal are fanned-out, or distributed, along DSYNC and RCLKfan-out circuitry 36 and 38, respectively, disposed on the distributionof card 28. Distribution of these signals allows pattern generators onmultiple instruments to be started in unison as in the above referencedapplication WO/03042710.

The instruments on instrument cards 30 may be digital or analoginstruments or may perform functions involving digital and analogsignals. Instrument 30A depicts a digital instrument, also called a“channel card.” A channel card may contain electronic resources formultiple tester channels. A test system is likely to include multiplechannel cards.

Further referring to FIG. 2, each channel card 30A includes a clockmodule 42. Clock module 42 may be programmed to generate one or moreclocks of a desired frequency from RCLK. In the described embodiment,each of the clocks generated by a clock module 42 is intended to be used“locally,” i.e. within the instrument or board containing the clockgenerator. A clock generator may generate clocks of several differentfrequencies. Because all of the clocks are generated from the samesource, the clocks may be considered synchronous with each other. Theclock module may be similar in construction to the analog clock moduledescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,188,253, previously incorporated byreference herein.

The local clocks may be derived through direct digital synthesis using aphase locked loop driven by a numeric counter oscillator (NCO) asdescribed in currently pending U.S. patent application Ser. No.10/748,488, entitled MULTI-STAGE NUMERIC COUNTER OSCILLATOR, filed Dec.29, 2003, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.That application describes a numeric counter oscillator that may be usedin a direct digital synthesis circuit to derive one or more local clocksof a programmable frequency from the reference clock.

Each instrument card includes circuitry to perform the desired functionof the instrument. In the case of a digital instrument such as 30A, thefunctional circuitry includes timing circuitry 47, and formatting/pinelectronics circuitry 48. This circuitry can generate and measuredigital signals for testing DUT 90.

In addition, digital instrument 30A includes a pattern generator 46.Pattern generator 46 provides a sequence of commands that control thefunctional portions of instrument 30A. Pattern generator 46 may providebranching in response to certain conditions or execute other conditionalfunctions based on a status of the test system. Pattern generator 46 isclocked by a clock from local clock module 40 and may therefore provideinstructions at a programmable rate, which may be higher than thefrequency of the reference clock.

In addition, instrument 30A includes an instrument synchronization link(ISL) interface 320A as will be described in greater detail below. ISLinterface 320A allows pattern generator 46 to communicate with otherinstruments. Pattern generator 46 may send commands to be executed bythe functional circuitry of other instruments or receive statusinformation from other instruments that may, for example, be used tocontrol conditional branching.

Other instruments may have different functional circuitry, depending onthe specific function to be implemented by the instrument. In thedescribed embodiment, each instrument card includes a clock module 42.

Each instrument in the described embodiment also includes an interfaceto the ISL. Some instruments may be a source of messages transmittedthrough the ISL. Others may be a destination for messages transmittedthrough the ISL. Instruments may be constructed with ISL interfaces thattransmit only or that receive only or that both transmit and receivemessages through the ISL. Alternatively, it may be desirable toconstruct a single integrated circuit that performs all ISL functionsand use that integrated circuit on all instruments that require any ofthe ISL functions. For instruments that do not use any ISL functions,the ISL interface may be omitted entirely.

Some instruments may contain a pattern generator having the same form aspattern generator 46. In one embodiment, each pattern generator isprogrammed with the specific commands that instrument needs to executeduring a test. However, not all instruments contain pattern generators.The instruments that do not contain pattern generators may receivecommands over the ISL based on the programs stored in pattern generatorsof other instruments. Accordingly, each pattern generator may beprogrammed with commands for multiple instruments in the system toexecute.

In one embodiment, digital instruments contain pattern generators andanalog instruments do not. Such a division is desirable because itallows the pattern generators for digital instruments to be redesignedeach time a digital instrument operating at a higher speed is designedwithout requiring changes on analog instruments. However, such apartitioning of the design is not required.

More generally, some instruments will act as controllers that sendcommands to other instruments. Other instruments will act as controlledinstruments that receive commands from other sources. Generally,controlled instruments will not have pattern generators or will not havepattern generators operating at the same rate as those in the digitalinstruments.

Coordinated operation of all instruments is often desired. Local clocksin multiple instruments may be synchronized as described in the abovementioned patent application WO/03042710. As shown in FIG. 3, areference clock, RCLK and a synchronization signal DSYNC, aredistributed to multiple instruments, such as 30A, 30B and 30C. The DSYNCsignal identifies a particular edge in the RCLK signal which is taken asa reference time by each instrument. Once the local clocks are alignedto a common time reference, each instrument may have a “watch” thattracks time by counting pulses of a local clock.

Events within the tester occurring on different instruments may becoordinated by reference to time as tracked by the local watches. Forexample, a first instrument may send a command to a second instrument.The time of execution of that command may be specified relative to thelocal watch of the first instrument. If the local watch on the secondinstrument is synchronized to the local watch on the first instrument,event controller circuitry 320 on the second instrument can initiateexecution of the command at the appropriate time by monitoring the localwatch on the second instrument. The appropriate time can be ascertainedeven if the instruments contain clock modules generating local clocks ofdifferent frequencies.

By establishing a common time reference, the signals that convey thecommands or other messages need not be transmitted synchronously. Arelatively low cost and simple asynchronous communication link may beemployed that relies on time values in messages—rather than arrivaltimes of certain signals—to control timing of events.

FIG. 3 shows that the instrument synchronization link (ISL) shown inFIG. 2 is formed by a communications network. Here, that network haslines, such as 310A, 310B and 310C, connected to each of the instrumentssuch as 30A, 301 and 30C. Connections to the network may be made in anysuitable manner. For example, each ISL interface may have a port orother connection point. A port may be formed physically by a connectorattached to the instrument such that lines carrying signals on the ISLmay be readily coupled to the instrument. In the case where ISL linesare physically implemented as traces in a backplane or other printedcircuit board in the tester, the port could be implemented as abackplane connector. Where the lines of the ISL are implemented asdiscrete cables, the port may be implemented as a discrete connector,such as an RJ-45 receptacle. Communication between instruments isfacilitated by router 300 that passes signals from a line connected toan instrument acting as a source of a message to the lines connected tothe instruments intended to be the destination of the message.

Various implementations of communication lines and routers are known.Because synchronization need not be provided by the characteristics ofthe transmission media, the specific implementation of the communicationline and the router is not critical to the invention. For example, eachof the communication lines 310A . . . 310C may be a high speed serialline, such as is sometimes called a SerDes line. Firewire and USB2 areexamples of standard SerDes communication protocols. Communication overlines 310A . . . 310C could use such a standard protocol. But, aprotocol requiring fewer overhead bits is used in the describedembodiment to provide lower latency for message transmissions.

Here, the communication lines operate in excess of 1 Gbps and messagesare packet based. Each packet may include various fields to facilitatecommunication. For example, a packet may include a header with a sourceand destination ID. Each instrument may have its own ID value that couldbe used to specify the source and the destination of a particularmessage.

A packet may also include a field for a command value. The command valuemay specify the action for the instrument identified in the destinationfield to perform. In one embodiment, each instrument has a microcodestore that contains multiple microcode sequences corresponding tovarious operations the instrument may perform. The command specifies aparticular microcode sequence. The instrument executes a command byexecuting the specified microcode sequence from the store.

A command field may also signal a status to another instrument. Forexample, an instrument may place a value in the command field indicatingthat it detected a failure or that it completed a measurement. Theinstrument receiving this command value may then respond appropriately,such as by transferring the results of the measurement to a processor oraltering execution of a test pattern to reflect the failure.

In the illustrated embodiment, packets also include a time value,sometimes called a “time stamp.” When the command field indicates anevent to be executed, the time stamp indicates the time at which thisevent should happen. When the command field indicates a status, the timestamp may indicate the time at which a conditional operation, such as abranch to be taken in response to that status, should be performed. Asdescribed above, the local watches in all the instruments aresynchronized so that each instrument can communicate time valuesrelative to the same DSYNC event.

Packets may include further fields. For example, a checksum field orother fields may be added for error detection or error correction.Multiple messages, each communicating a command or status event, may beincluded in one packet. Each such message could have its own time stamp.

In the illustrated embodiment, the ISL includes a router 300. Router 300may be implemented to operate according to any convenient algorithm. Forexample, router 300 may receive each inbound message and transmit anoutbound message on a specific line based on the destination value inthe packet header.

In the embodiment of FIG. 3, instruments 30A and 30B are illustrated asdigital channel cards. Each includes a pattern generator, 46A and 46Brespectively. Instrument 30C represents an analog instrument. Analoginstrument 30C as illustrated in FIG. 3 does not include a separatepattern generator. Analog instrument 30C includes an event controllerconnected to local clock module 42C, which contains sufficient circuitryto receive and respond to commands and/or send status messages. Theevent controller 320 is described in greater detail in connection withFIG. 5, below.

The pattern generators in the digital instruments contain programs thatspecify the sequence of operations to be performed during testing of adevice. In the illustrated embodiment, these programs specify operationsto be performed by both analog and digital instruments. They mayspecify, for example, that a certain analog source is to generate a sinewave of a desired frequency at a certain time relative to an event in adigital channel or that a receiver is to start capturing the output of aDUT at a particular time relative to an event in the digital channel.

FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate the process by which local watches in twoinstruments are synchronized. As described above, each instrument mayinclude a clock module to generate one or more local clocks. In thedescribed embodiment, each clock module receives a reference clock,RCLK, and a synchronization signal, DSYNC.

FIG. 4A illustrates that the DSYNC signal identifyes a specific edge ofthe reference clock signal at time E₁. Preferably, the RCLK and DSYNCsignals will be distributed to each of the clock modules such that theclock module in each of the instruments can identify time E₁ as areference time.

FIG. 4A also illustrates the signal LCLKA. LCLKA represents a localclock generated by a clock module. LCLKA is shown to have a shorterperiod than RCLK. Accordingly, counting pulses of LCLKA allows a watchto track time with relatively high resolution.

LCLKA is aligned with the reference clock. As described in the abovereferenced patents and patent application, it is known to align a localclock signal with the reference clock signal on the occurrence of theDSYNC signal. In the example used herein, LCLKA is generated with a DDScircuit that includes an NCO. At time E₁, the NCO is set to apredetermined value to establish a phase for LCLKA relative RCLK. Priorto time E₁, LCLKA may not be aligned with RCLK, meaning that there is nodeterministic relationship between the edges of LCLKA and RCLK or thatthe relationship is not known. However, some settling time after E₁, thesignal LCLKA becomes aligned with RCLK. As shown, LCLKA has a differentperiod than RCLK. Thus, alignment of clocks does not require that alledges be coincident. Rather, as used herein, the term implies that thereis a relationship between edges that is repeatable each time a testprogram is executed.

After this settling interval an edge of the signal LCLKA is used to setthe local watch. Here, that edge is illustrated at time E₂. The time E₂occurs a delay, D_(AT), after the time E₁. In the described embodiment,the clock module generates local clocks using phase locked loopcircuitry. After any change in the input or settings of the phase lockedloop, the output of the phase locked loop may contain jitter orotherwise not be predictable. The delay, D_(AT), allows the phase lockedlooped to settle to a predictable value.

The delay D_(AT) can be determined because the clock generation circuitincludes an NCO portion, which is implemented with digital circuitry andtherefore has a deterministic output even during the settling interval.Therefore, the interval D_(AT) can be measured by counting cycles of theNCO, even though the output of the phase locked loop is not stableduring that interval. The specific number of cycles in the settlinginterval will depend on the specific design of the clock module.

In the illustrated embodiment, the accumulator within the NCO is resetto zero at time E₁ and cycles through the NCO are counted until asufficient interval has passed that the output of the phase locked loopwill be stable. At the end of the settling interval, the local watch isloaded with a value equal to the settling interval D_(AT). In this way,the watch tracks time with the time E₁ identified by the DSYNC signalacting as the zero time reference.

In the embodiment described herein, the process of FIG. 4A is used toset a watch in each instrument that may act as a controller instrument.WATCHA represents the watch in a controller instrument. At time E₁,WATCHA has a value 402. The value 402 is indeterminate because WATCHAhas not been set at that time. FIG. 4A shows that at time E₂, WATCHA isloaded with the value 404, representing the delay, D_(AT). Thereafter,WATCHA increments for each pulse of LCLKA, with the amount of eachincrement reflecting the length of a period of LCLKA. For example, value406 shows WATCHA one pulse of LCLKA after value 404.

Controlled instruments may also include local clocks that clock watcheson those instruments. However, for those watches to be useful inidentifying times, they must be synchronized to the watch in thecontroller instrument. FIG. 4A shows a local clock LCLKB in a controlledinstrument LCLKB. It may be, but need not be, of the same frequency asLCLKA. For the most accurate and repeatable tracking of time within thetest system, it is preferable the LCLKB be aligned with LCLKA. Also, aWATCHB on the controlled instrument should be loaded with a time valuethat corresponds with the value in a WATCHA on the controllerinstrument.

FIG. 4A shows that the values 412 and 414 in WACTHB at times E₁ and E₂are indeterminate, because they have not been synchronized to WATCHA.Also, FIG. 4A shows that local clocks LCLKA and LCLKB may not bealigned, meaning that there is not necessarily a known relationshipbetween the edges of LCLKA and LCLKB.

Despite the fact that WATCHB initially has indeterminate values, acontrolled instrument may track time using a LOW_RES watch. The LOW_RESwatch has a lower resolution than WATCHA in the controller instrument.However, the LOW_RES watch can be readily synchronized to WATCHA andused to synchronize WATCHA to WATCHB. FIG. 4A identifies this lowresolution watch as LOW_RES. At time E₁ LOW_RES watch takes on a value408. Time E₁ is taken as the reference point for WATCHA. Accordingly,LOW_RES watch is given a value of zero at time E₁. A controlledinstrument may readily identify the time E₁ in the described embodimentsbecause all instruments receive the RCLK and DSYNC signals.

LOW_RES watch increments one count for each cycle of RCLK. In theillustrated embodiment, LOW_RES watch contains a field 418 that trackstime with the same resolution as field 416, representing the mostsignificant bits of WATCHA. Accordingly, FIG. 4A shows that after WATCHAis set at time E₂, the value in field 418 approximates the value infield 416 of WATCHA. Differences may be attributed to rounding linked tothe fact that WATCHA represents time with greater resolution thanLOW_RES watch and that LCLK and RCLK edges occur at different times.

In FIG. 4A, LOW_RES watch is shown with fields 420 and 422 havingindeterminate values. These fields represent the least significantfields of LOW_RES and represent more bits of resolution than LOW_RESwatch can produce. Accordingly, their values are not shown and they canbe assumed to be zero to allow a ready comparison between the values inWATCHA and LOW_RES watch. Fields 420 and 422 need not be included in animplementation of LOW_RES watch.

FIG. 4B illustrates the process by which a controller instrument maysynchronize its local watch, here designated WATCHA, with a local watchon a controlled instrument, here designated WATCHB. The process involvesthe controller instrument sending a command to the controlled instrumentindicating that WATCHB should be synchronized with WATCHA. The commandincludes a time stamp 450, which identifies the time at which thesynchronization should occur as well as the synchronization value.

At some time, denoted E₃ in FIG. 4B, the controller instrument computesa time stamp 450 that is sent to the controlled instrument in a command.At time E₃, WATCHA is shown to have the value 430. At time E₃, the value434 in WATCHB is still indeterminate. The LOW_RES watch on thecontrolled instrument has a value 432. The value 432 approximates thevalue 430 to the limits of resolution of LOW_RES watch.

The value in WATCHA at time E₃ is used to compute a time stamp 450. Timestamp 450 is computed by adding some offset to the value in WATCHA atthe time the time stamp 450 is computed. The amount of the offset ispreferably sufficiently long to allow a message containing the timestamp to be transmitted from the controller instrument to the controlledinstrument. In this way, the time stamp 450 will represent a time thatoccurs after the controlled instrument receives the synchronizationcommand.

In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 4B, the time stamp 450 includesfields 452 and 454. WATCHA includes fields 416 and 456 that have thesame number of bits as fields 452 and 454, respectively. WATCHA includesadditional bits in field 458. The additional bits in field 458 representadditional resolution with which WATCHA tracks time, but bits with thatresolution are, in the pictured embodiment, truncated in computing thevalue of time stamp 450.

The value in time stamp 450 may be used to identify the time at whichthe resynchronize watches command should be executed. The mostsignificant bits of time stamp 450 in field 452 represent time with thesame resolution as LOW_RES watch. At some time, denoted E₄ in FIG. 4B,LOW_RES watch takes on a value 456 matching the bits in field 452 oftime stamp 450. By comparing the value in LOW_RES watch to the value infield 452 of time stamp 450, a controlled instrument may identify thetime E₄.

The value represented by time stamp 450 occurs a time R₁ after time E₄.This time is represented in FIG. 4B as E₅. To generate a local clockwith a reference edge at time E₅, the local clock must be aligned attime E₄ with a value that will create the same effect as aligning anedge of the local clock at time E₅. LCLKB is aligned at time E₄ bysetting the value in the NCO of the DDS circuit used to generate LCLKBto a value based on R₁. Conceptially, an interval R1 after time E4(e.g., time E5), the NCO should be at “zero,” indicating an edge ofLCLKB should occur. Even though LCLKB is not available at time E4 of E5,the values in the timing circuitry of the controlled instrument are setso that when the circuitry settles and LCLKB is generated, LCLKB willhave a phase as if it had an edge at time E5.

Some settling interval is then required. The settling interval isillustrated in FIG. 4B as D_(AT2).

The end of the settling interval is illustrated at time E₆. At time E₆,WATCHB is loaded with an initial value and clocked with LCLKB. WATCHB isloaded with a time that represents the value of time stamp 450 in thesynchronization command plus the delay D_(AT2). In this way, WATCHB isloaded with a value having a deterministic relationship to the value inWATCHA and is thereafter clocked by LCLKB, which has a repeatablerelationship to the local clock that clocks WATCHA. In this way, WATCHBis synchronized to WATCHA.

In the example of FIG. 4B, a possible source of variation results fromtruncation of the value used to create time startup 450. As describedabove, an amount R₂ is truncated from the time stamp before it istransmitted. Thus, when WATCHB is synchronized to WATCHA, WATCHB isloaded with a value that is smaller than the value in WATCHA by anamount R2. The value of R₂ may vary each time a test program isrepeated. Precision with which commands can be repeatedly executed canbe increased by storing the remainder R₂ and using it to adjust any timestamp values in commands from a controller instrument to a controlledinstrument in which the watches are synchronized according to theprocess shown in FIG. 4B.

Turning now to FIG. 5, a block diagram of an interface circuit that canbe used to communicate commands between a source board 510 and adestination board 540 is shown. Source board 510 includes functionalcircuitry 590 and destination board 540 includes functional circuitry592. In the embodiment where source and destination boards 510 and 540are instruments, the functional circuitry executes the functionsrequired for the instrument and may be circuitry as now known in the artor as later developed to perform functions used to test semiconductordevices. For example, source board 510 may be a digital instrument 30Aand destination board 540 may be an analog instrument 30C and each maycontain functional circuitry appropriate for generating and measuringdigital or analog signals, respectively.

Here, source board 510 is shown to have pattern generator 46A thatgenerates commands to control the functional circuitry 590. Destinationboard 540 is shown without a pattern generator. Pattern generator 46Agenerates commands for destination board 540. Those commands arecommunicated to destination board 540 over the ISL.

A communication path between the boards is provided through router 330,which is part of the ISL. Source board 510 includes an interface circuit320A to facilitate communication over the ISL. Destination board 540includes an interface circuit 320B. Each interface circuit 320A and 320Bmay be implemented as one or more ASICs or other integrated circuitchips.

Interface 320A includes PHY 530 and interface 320B includes PHY 550. PHY530 and PHY 550 are the circuitry needed to manage communicationaccording to the selected protocol of the ISL. This circuitry performsfunctions traditionally performed in the hardware components of anetwork interface, such as forming messages into packets, checkingparity, driving and receiving data over the physical network connection,retransmitting packets upon an error and passing valid packets receivedto the next higher level of the network for processing. PHY 530 and 550can also verify that messages comply with the format of the selectedprotocol. For example, they may check that source or destination ID'scorrespond to valid source and destination ID's in the tester. Or, theymay check that the value in the time stamp field of a message representsa valid future time.

Transmission of a packet in this example is initiated by patterngenerator 46A indicating an “event” is to happen. The event indicatesthat the instrument on destination board 540 is to perform a command. Inaddition to specifying the event to occur, pattern generator 46Aindicates a time when the event is to occur. In the illustratedembodiment, the time of the event is an offset from the current time.

The offset is provided to a time stamper circuit 516. Time stampercircuit 516 computes a time stamp indicating the time at whichdestination board 540 is to execute the command and passes this timestamp, along with the indication of the event, to PHY 530 fortransmission. The current time for interface 320A is kept in WATCHA 514.

The “watch” may be implemented in any convenient way, but preferablyincludes a circuit that records passage of time based on a clock signal.Preferably, the watch is clocked by a clock that is synchronous with theclock that drives pattern generator 46A. The watch may be implementedsimply as a counter with a small amount of control circuitry to resetand load the counter to perform the functions described herein. In theillustrated embodiment, WATCHA 514 is clocked by local clock LCLKAgenerated by a local clock module 42A. The number of bits of resolutionwith which each watch tracks time is not critical to the invention. Eachwatch preferably has a number of bits that allows it to track time witha resolution equal to or smaller than the period of the clock drivingthat watch. Preferably, all clocks will have at least as many bits ofresolution as the time stamps in messages passed from instrument toinstrument. However, individual instruments may track time with greateror lesser precision.

Destination board 540 includes a WATCHB 552. WATCHB 552 keeps timerelative to local clock LCLKB. It is not necessary that LCLKA and LCLKBbe clocks of the same frequency. Rather, it is sufficient that WATCHA514 and WATCHB 552 either output time in the same format or that thetime values in the format generated by WATCHA 514 and WATCHB 552 beconverted to some common time format before time stamps generatedrelative to one watch are compared to the time kept by a differentwatch. Here, WATCHA and WATCHB are synchronized according to the processillustrated in FIGS. 4A and 4B.

In the illustrated embodiment, the value stored WATCHA 514 is augmentedby the remainder value R₂ stored at the last synchronization of watches.This value is stored in a register 518. As described above in connectionwith FIG. 4B, the remainder R₂ represents a difference between the timetracked in WATCHA and the time tracked in WATCHB that is introduced bytruncating the value used to create a time stamp for the synchronizewatches command. By adding this remainder value to the time used tocreate the time stamp for all commands after the synchronize watchescommand, the truncation has no effect on the time at which destinationboard 540 responds to a command.

FIG. 5 shows a ganged switch 519 at the input and output of remainderregister 518. Switch 519 represents that in some cycles the remaindervalue R₂ is derived from a value in WATCHA 514. In the cycles when R₂ isbeing stored the value in register 518 is not used to adjust the time inWATCHA 514. Here, switch 519 represents any circuitry that performs thedesired function.

In computing the time stamp, the value in WATCHA is also augmented by alatency value stored in register 512. The latency value is selected tobe longer than the maximum transmission delay for a message from sourceboard 510 to any other destination board 540. Preferably, the latencyvalue is fixed. Test systems are generally calibrated for fixed delaysbetween instruments. Accordingly introduction of a fixed delay does notintroduce any errors in timing, but helps ensure that the destinationboard does not receive a message specifying execution of a command at atime that passed while the message was being transmitted over the ISL.

When a packet is sent by source board 510 to destination board 540, thepacket passes through PHY 550. As above, PHY 550 is hardware dedicatedto managing network functions. When PHY 550 receives a valid packet, thecontents of the packet are communicated to higher level circuitry. Asillustrated, a packet containing a message indicating an event to beexecuted is passed to time un-stamper 556.

Time un-stamper 556 outputs control signals to the rest of the circuitryon destination board 540 when an event specified in a command is to beexecuted. A line carrying a control signal that causes functionalcircuitry 592 to execute an event is pictured. It should be appreciatedthat destination board 540 may respond to many types of commandsrequiring control signals to be sent to other circuitry on destinationboard 540. For example, it is described above that a controlledinstrument may receive a synchronize watches commands. Such a commandtriggers alignment of clocks within clock module 42C and loading valuesinto WATCHB. Therefore, control signals may also run from timeun-stamper 556 to clock module 42C and WATCH B 552. Lines carrying othercontrol signals may be present, but are not shown for clarity.

Multiplexer 560 is controlled to provide a value to time un-stamperbased on the synchronization process in FIG. 4B. Time un-stamper 556monitors the time input to identify when the time specified in a timestamp is reached. At this time, time un-stamper 556 asserts theappropriate control signals.

Time un-stamper 556 receives a current time value through multiplexer560. Multiplexer 560 is steered based on the command to be executed. Fora synchronize watches command, time values are derived from LOW_RESwatch 558. For all other commands, time values may be provided fromWATCHB 552. Multiplexer 560 represents any circuit that provides thevalue of to LOW_RES watch 448 to time un-stamper 556 before WATCHB issynchronized and provides the value in WATCHB 552 after it issynchronized.

Low resolution watch 558 counts pulses of RCLK and is reset uponassertion of the DSYNC signal as described in FIG. 4A. Low resolutionwatch 558 may be a separate hardware element from local watch 552.Alternatively, low resolution watch 550 may be a logical constructimplemented by using only the high order bits of local watch 552.

When a packet transmitted over the ISL specifies an event to beperformed by functional circuitry 592, time un-stamper 556 outputs thecommand portion of that packet to the functional circuitry 592 in theinstrument at the time specified in the time stamp. The instrument mayprocess the command output by time un-stamper 556 in the same way thatprior art instruments responded to commands output by patterngenerators. In one embodiment, the event signal indexes a microcodememory based on the command value and starts a sequencer thatsuccessively retrieves and executes microcode instructions from thememory.

Various implementations of time un-stamper 556 are possible. Timeun-stamper 556 may contain a single unit with a register to store thetime stamp from a message and to temporarily store the command value.The unit may include a digital comparator that compares the time stampto the appropriately offset value from the local watch. Controlcircuitry may monitor the output of the comparator and pass the commandvalue to the output when the time values match. Other interfacecircuitry may be included to signal the rest of the circuitry in theinstrument to execute the command.

However, more complex implementations are possible. For example, thetime un-stamper may include multiple units so that multiple commands maybe scheduled for the instrument. Time un-stamper would then output eachcommand to be executed at the time indicated by its corresponding timestamp. Multiple time un-stamper units may also allow commands to beprocessed in an order other than the order received.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating the process by which a system, suchas an automatic test system as shown in FIG. 2 or 3, may operate.

The process includes two parallel sub-processes shown as sub-process 620and sub-process 650. In the example of FIG. 6, sub-process 620 isexecuted in the ISL interface 320A (FIG. 5) of a controller instrument.Sub-process 650 is implemented in the ISL interface 320B (FIG. 5) of acontrolled instrument.

At step 610, a local clock within the controller instrument is alignedwith RCLK. A process as illustrated above in connection with FIG. 4A maybe performed to align the clock. Within the controlled instrument, step652 may be performed at the same time. At step 652, a LOW_RES watch isreset and controlled to begin counting pulses of RCLK.

The controlled instrument then waits at step 656 to receive a commandover the ISL. At step 622, the controller instrument waits for thealignment delay time as illustrated in FIG. 4A.

At step 624, a watch within the controller instrument is loaded with thealignment delay time and that watch starts running.

At step 626, the controller instrument sends a “synchronize watches”command to the controlled instrument over the ISL. This command may besent in response to a command programmed in a pattern generator on thecontroller instrument. The synchronization command includes a time stampas indicated at 416 in FIG. 4B.

At step 658, the controlled instrument receives the command over the ISLand waits until the low resolution watch indicates a time that matchesthe most significant bits of the time stamp in the synchronize watchescommand.

At step 660, the value to be loaded into the NCO used to generate LCLKBis computed. The value is computed such that, if the value is loadedinto the NCO at time E₄, LCLKB, when finally generated, has a phase, asif it had an edge at time E₅. As illustrated by FIG. 4B, this valuedepends on the value of R₁. It also depends on the frequency of theclock used to clock that NCO and may depend on other factors relating tothe design of the clock generation circuit.

At the alignment time indicated by the LOW-RES watch, the controlledinstrument aligns its local clock at step 662. Alignment of the clock atstep 662 is performed by loading the computed value into the NCO.

At step 664 the controlled instrument waits an alignment delay time,such as is indicated by D_(AT2) in FIG. 4B. After the alignment delaytime, the process continues to step 666. At this step, WATCHB is loadedwith a value representing the sum of the time stamp in theresynchronized watches command and the alignment delay time used at step664. Thereafter, the WATCHB maybe clocked by the local clock in thecontrolled instrument.

Subprocess 650 continues at step 668, where the controlled instrumentwaits for further commands from the controller instrument.

On the controller instrument, the process proceeds from step 626 to step632. At step 632, the remainder reflecting the truncated portion R₂shown in FIG. 4B is stored. The remainder may be stored, for example, ina register such as 518 (FIG. 5).

Sub-process 620 continues on the controller instrument at step 634. Atstep 634, the interface circuit waits for a command to send to anotherinstrument. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, interface circuit 320Amay receive commands from pattern generator 46A. When interface circuit320A receives a command, the process proceeds to step 636.

At step 636 the interface circuit computes the time stamp to betransmitted along with the command. For an interface circuit shown inthe embodiment of FIG. 5, the time stamp is computed by adding to thecurrent time stored in the local watch, the remainder value stored atstep 632 and a predetermined latency to an offset that is programmed inthe pattern generator.

At step 638, interface circuit 320A forms a packet including the timestamp computed at step 636 and transmits the packet over the ISL.

Interface circuit 320B on the controlled instrument waits at step 668until a command is received. When the command is received over the ISL,the process continues at step 670. At that step, the time stamp from thepacket received over the ISL is loaded into a time un-stamper, such as556 (FIG. 5).

At step 672, the time un-stamper waits until the time stored in thelocal watch provided to the time un-stamper has a time value matchingthe time stamp stored at step 670. When the stored time stamp matchesthe time on the local watch, the process continues at step 674.

At step 674, time un-stamper 556 asserts control signals for functionalcircuitry 592 that cause a command specified in the packet sent at step638 to be executed by functional circuitry 592.

The process may continue in this way with the controller instrumentgenerating additional commands and the controlled instrument respondingto those commands. The specific commands executed may depend on the typeof functional circuitry within the instruments. The additional commandsexecuted may include the synchronize watches command, which may occurmore than once during the operation of the tester.

The described embodiment provides several advantages. The architecturedescribed above enables commands to be asynchronously communicatedbetween instruments, meaning that the time of execution of the commanddoes not depend directly on the time the command is received. Precisesynchronization is provided—with less than 10 picoseconds of resolutionand preferably less than 1 picosecond of resolution. Yet, the only clockdistributed throughout the test system is relatively low frequency. Thereference clock is preferably less than 200 MHz and preferably 125 MHzor less. A currently contemplated embodiment has a reference clock of100 MHz. An accurate, low frequency clock can be generated with lessexpensive circuitry than a higher frequency clock and is more easilyrouted throughout the test system.

Further, the architecture shown in FIG. 3 decouples the design foranalog instrument 30C from the design of the pattern generators used inthe test system 20. Advantageously, an analog instrument developed for asystem employing the architecture of FIG. 3 may be used in any testsystem designed with the same architecture. Such a capability isimportant where it is necessary to frequently change the design ofdigital instruments to allow operation at higher clock rates. Asignificant cost savings is provided to both manufacturers and users ofautomatic test equipment if instrument designs can be carried forwardfrom one generation of test equipment to the next. Even furtheradvantage is obtained where the interfaces to instruments can bemaintained from generation to generation. If the design and interfaceremains the same, the same physical boards containing the instrumentsmay be directly moved from one test system to another test system.

Further, the use of a third party instruments may be more readilyfacilitated. The third party instruments could be integrated into a testsystem with a relatively compact interface that includes the eventcontroller such as is shown in FIG. 5. Such an interface may beconstructed on a single integrated circuit chip or a small number ofchips or otherwise conveniently packaged as a circuit module. Theinterface may optionally include a local clock module. A testermanufacturer may provide the interface to third party instrumentsuppliers who could incorporate them into instruments. Instruments usingthe defined interface may then be readily incorporated into testsystems.

Further, the above architecture allows many other desirable features tobe easily implemented. For example, it is not necessary that messages onthe communication links between instruments be directed to a singleinstrument at a time. Broadcast messaging may be implemented by defininga destination ID that could be included in a packet to indicate that allinstruments in the system should receive and process the packet. Eachinstrument may receive and respond to messages with either their own IDor the broadcast ID in the destination field of the message. Preferably,when a group of controlled instruments receives a command, allinstruments in the group have watches that have been synchronized to thewatch in the instrument sending the command.

Further, a limited form of broadcast messaging may be employed to create“pattern groups.” Messages with a “pattern group” ID in the destinationfield would be responded to by all instruments in a group assigned thatID. For example, all of the instruments that receive commands from aparticular pattern generator may be assigned to one pattern group. Inthis way, a single message addressed generally to the pattern groupwould synchronize the watches in all of the instruments in the group.

An advantage of pattern group addressing is that it allows a user toprogram the tester with multiple “logical pattern generators.” Eachlogical pattern generator could be programmed to have an independenttest flow. For example, in testing a semiconductor device with a fastbus and a slow bus, the circuitry to generate and measure signals totest the fast bus may be on instruments assigned to one pattern group.The circuitry to generate and measure signals to test the slow bus maybe on instruments assigned to a second pattern group. Both buses couldbe tested simultaneously, but the programs to test each bus could bewritten independently and stored in separate pattern generators forindependent execution.

An instrument may belong to more than one pattern group, thougharbitration may be employed in such a scenario to ensure that no singleinstrument simultaneously received inconsistent commands or morecommands than it could process. For example, destination ID's that allowmessages to be sent to instruments in multiple pattern groups wouldallow the pattern groups to be synchronized.

While the invention has been particularly shown and described withreference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood bythose skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail may bemade therein without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention.

For example, various physical implementations of a communication linkare possible. SerDes lines are shown as single lines. Such lines usedmay be implemented with twisted pair, coax, optical fiber or any othersuitable physical medium. Further, two lines may be used to allowtwo-way communication between pattern generators and event controllers.Or, a single duplexed line may be used. Alternatively, it may beadequate to provide for only one-way communication from patterngenerators to event controllers. Moreover, it is not necessary that thecommunication link be serial. Other forms of communications networks maybe used. It is described that a packet switched network is employed, butembodiments may be constructed using other types of networks.

Each instrument is shown to have one clock module. An instrument mayhave more than one clock module. Further, the described embodiment showsthat each digital instrument includes a pattern generator. Not alldigital instruments must have a pattern generator to obtain benefits ofthe invention. Some digital instruments may receive commands frompattern generators on other digital instruments. For example, somedigital instruments may generate relatively low frequency patterns whileothers generate high frequency patterns. The low frequency instrumentsmay receive commands from the higher frequency ones. Alternatively, someor all of the digital instruments may receive commands from a centralpattern generator. Even when all digital instruments contain patterngenerators, it still may be desirable for some digital instruments tosend commands or status messages to others.

In FIG. 4B, prior to a synchronization of watches, a low resolutionwatch is used. After synchronization, WATCHB tracks time with aresolution equal to the period of LCLKB, i.e. a high resolution watch.Alternatives exist for implementing WATCHB and a LOW_RES watch. Separatehardware may be used to implement the low resolution and the highresolution watches. Alternatively, the same hardware may be used forboth the low resolution watch and the low resolution portion of the highresolution watch.

Further, the ISL is shown to connect instruments to each other. Otherparts of the system may be connected to the instruments through the ISL.For example, the master region board may be connected to the ISL toallow communication with instruments or to allow commands from computerwork station 22 to be communicated over the ISL.

The ISL is shown implemented with a router. A router is not required.Similar functionality may be provided with any packet switching circuitor circuit switching circuitry. Alternatively, every instrument mayreceive every packet and select only the packets addressed to it.However, having a router or similar switching circuit reduces the rateat which each instrument must process packets. It also facilitatesbroadcast addressing and pattern groups because each can be implementedby programming an address translation table in the switching circuitrywithout the need to reprogram logic on each instrument.

Where synchronization is achieved by aligning edges of two clocks,either clock may be delayed until one of its edges has the desired timerelationship with an edge of the other clock. Likewise, clocks and othertiming circuits may be implemented by circuits that count up or countdown. Accordingly adding time values may result in larger or smallernumbers, depending on how the times are tracked.

Also, it is not necessary that all time un-stampers in a test systemmeasure time with the same precision or that each time un-stampermeasure time with the same precision as the time stamp in a message. Itis possible that a time un-stamper may output an event indication when alocal clock reaches a time equal to only some number of the mostsignificant bits in the time stamp of a message. The time un-stampermay, along with an indication that an event is to be performed, provideto the functional circuit the remaining least significant bits of thetime stamp. The functional part of the instrument may use the remainingleast significant bits as an offset and execute the command at a timeoffset from the event signal by that amount.

Some time values are shown offset by multiple values. Also, variousoperations are described in which an offset is added to one of the timevalues on one instrument synchronized to another instrument. Coordinatedoperation may be achieved by subtracting the same amount from the othervalue. Neither the order nor the location in which offsets are combinedis critical. For example, FIG. 5 shows remainder and latency valuesadded to the outputs of local watches. These values could be introducedwithin the local watches. Or, these values may be introduced within thecircuitry that generates the local clocks.

Also, it is described above that instruments are “synchronized.” As usedherein, instruments are synchronized when there is a deterministic timerelationship between the operation of the instruments. With synchronizedinstruments, a tester should, within the timing accuracy of the tester,perform the same each time a test is repeated. In contrast, if theinstruments are not synchronized, intervals between test functionsexecuted by different instruments may vary from test to test by amountsgreater than the timing accuracy of the tester. “Synchronized” does not,however, require that operations be coincident or simultaneous.Instruments may, for example, be considered to be synchronized even ifthere is some delay between a command executed on one instrument and anaction taken on another instrument in response to that command.

Likewise, it is described that clocks are “aligned.” Clocks are picturedas having coincident rising edges when aligned. Such a representation isfor clarity of illustration. Two clocks may be considered aligned solong as some portion of one clock signal occurs with a deterministictime relationship to some portion of the other clock signal. Further, itis not necessary that this relationship be repeated in every cycle ofthe clocks. In cases where two clocks that have different periods, therelative position of edges of the two signals may change from cycle tocycle. However, if the clocks are aligned at some time, the relationshipbetween edges is deterministic to within limits imposed by the stabilityof the signals.

Further, FIG. 4B illustrates WATCHA and WATCHB having the same mostsignificant bits when synchronized. Such values are shown forsimplicity. The watches may be considered synchronized even if there issome fixed offset between them. As described above, fixed offsetsbetween timing of events in different channels of a test system may bereadily calibrated out and do not create a source of error. Further,watches may be considered synchronized even if there are differences inthe least significant bits at any given time. If WATCHA and WATCHB areclocked by local clocks of different frequencies, the watches willincrement at different times and will increment by different amountsthat are proportional to the period of the respective local clockclocking the watch. However, so long as timing of events is repeatablefrom test to test, the watches may be considered to be synchronized.

Further, FIGS. 4A and 4B illustrate that a synchronize watches commandcan be executed at any time that can be expressed in WATCHA, even ifthis time is specified with a resolution that cannot be transmitted orprocessed by WATCHB. If restrictions are placed on operation of the testsystem, simplifications may be placed on design of some of thecircuitry. For example, if synchronize commands are only allowed to beperformed at times that can be represented by the value in a time stamp,the need to store a remainder may be avoided. However, constraining thetimes at which the synchronize watches command may be undesirable.

As a further alternative, synchronization of watches may be achievedwithout storing a remainder value R₂ may be achieved by setting theleast significant bits of the watch on the controller instrument to zerowhen the resynchronize watches command is executed. Such an approach ismost useful in a system in which all watches are simultaneouslyresynchronized.

FIG. 3 shows three instruments connected through router 300. This numberof connections is to demonstrate the principle of operation only.Likely, a tester would include more than three instruments.

Further, instruments are described as analog and digital instruments.Many instruments process both analog and digital signals and thespecific type of instruments is not a limitation on the invention.

Such alterations, modifications, and improvements are intended to bepart of this disclosure, and are intended to be within the spirit andscope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description anddrawings are by way of example only.

1. A test system, comprising: a) a reference clock generator providing areference clock; b) a first instrument comprising i) a first local clockgenerator coupled to the reference clock generator and providing a firstlocal clock generated from the reference clock, ii) a first controlcircuit storing programmed commands for the plurality of instruments,and c) a second instrument comprising i) a second local clock generatorcoupled to the reference clock generator and providing a second localclock generated from the reference clock; ii) a second control circuithaving an input and an output, the second control circuit asserting theoutput at a time specified by a time value provided at the input to thesecond control circuit; iii) functional circuitry having a control inputcoupled to the output of the second control circuit, the functionalcircuitry executing a function in response to a value asserted at itscontrol input; and d) a network between at least the first instrumentand the second instrument, the network carrying a message that includesa time value, wherein the first control circuit is coupled to thenetwork to provide the time value in the message and the second controlcircuit is coupled to the network to receive the time value at itsinput.
 2. The test system of claim 1 wherein: a) the message carried bythe network further includes an event code, b) the first control circuitis coupled to the network to generate an event code associated with thetime value, c) the second control circuit is coupled to the network toreceive the event code associated with the time value, and d) the secondcontrol circuit has an event output coupled to the function circuitry,the event output having a value indicating the event code at a timedictated by the time value associated with the event code.
 3. The testsystem of claim 1 wherein the reference clock has a lower frequency thanthe first local clock and the second local clock.
 4. The test system ofclaim 1 additionally comprising a master control circuit generating asynchronization signal provided to the first instrument, and wherein thefirst local clock generator comprises circuitry to align the first localclock in response to the synchronization signal.
 5. The test system ofclaim 1 wherein the reference clock has a frequency of less than 500 MHzand a local clock generator in at least one of the first and secondlocal clocks has a frequency in excess of 800 MHz.
 6. The test system ofclaim 1 wherein the network comprises a switching circuit and aplurality of lines, each coupled between the switching circuit and aninstrument.
 7. The test system of claim 6 wherein the switching circuitcomprises a router.
 8. The test system of claim 6 wherein the messagecarried on the network includes an address and the switching circuitadditionally comprises an address table that associates each of aplurality of addresses with one or more of the plurality of lines andcircuitry that provides the message on a line selectively in response tothe value of an address in the message and an entry in the addresstable.
 9. The test system of claim 8 wherein at least one of theplurality of addresses is associated with a plurality of lines.
 10. Thetest system of claim 8 wherein at least one address is associated withall of the lines.
 11. The test system of claim 1 wherein the firstcontrol circuit comprises a pattern generator.
 12. The test system ofclaim 1 wherein a) the first control circuit comprises a firsttime-tracking circuit, clocked by the first local clock; and b) thesecond control circuit comprises a second time-tracking circuit clockedby the second local clock.
 13. The test system of claim 1 wherein thefirst instrument comprises a digital instrument and the secondinstrument comprises an analog instrument.
 14. A method of operating atest system comprising at least two instruments, the test system furthercomprising a communication link between the at least two instruments,the method comprising: a) establishing a common time reference betweentiming circuits in the at least two instruments; b) sequencing on thefirst instrument through a test pattern defining events in a test, witha portion of the events to be executed by the first instrument and aportion of the events to be executed by the second instrument; c)communicating from the first instrument to the second instrument overthe communication link to specify at least one event to be executed bythe second instrument and a time at which the event is to be executed;and d) waiting until the specified time and executing the specifiedevent with the second instrument.
 15. The method of claim 14 whereineach of the timing circuits comprises a local clock generator having anumerically controlled oscillator with an accumulator and establishing acommon time reference comprises loading an alignment value in theaccumulator of the numerically controlled oscillator in at least thefirst instrument.
 16. The method of claim 15 wherein: a) establishing acommon time reference comprises providing a synchronization signal; andb) loading an alignment value in the accumulator of the numericallycontrolled oscillator in at least the first instrument comprises loadingan alignment value in the accumulator at a time dictated by thesynchronization signal.
 17. The method of claim 16 wherein the testsystem comprises a reference clock coupled to the at least twoinstruments and establishing a common time reference comprises countingpulses of the reference clock on the second instrument.
 18. The methodof claim 17 wherein establishing a common time reference comprises: a)counting periods of the reference clock to track time relative to a timeindicated by the synchronization signal; b) sending a message from thefirst instrument to the second instrument including a time value; and c)loading an alignment value dictated by the time value in the message inthe accumulator of the numerically controlled oscillator in the secondinstrument at a time dictated by the time value in the message and thetime tracked.
 19. The method of claim 14 wherein establishing a commontime reference comprises sending a message from the first instrument tothe second instrument, the message including a time value, andestablishing a time reference on the second instrument at a timedictated by at least a portion of the time value.
 20. The method ofclaim 19 wherein: a) the timing circuit in the first instrumentcomprises a first time-tracking circuit having a first time output andthe timing circuit in the second instrument comprises a secondtime-tracking circuit; b) sending a message from the first instrumentincluding a time value comprises generating a time value from the firsttime output; c) establishing a time reference on the second instrumentcomprises loading a value into the second time-tracking circuit based onthe time value generated from the first time output.
 21. The method ofclaim 19 wherein the timing circuit in the first instrument comprises afirst local clock generator and the timing circuit in the secondinstrument comprises a second local clock generator and establishing acommon time reference comprises aligning a clock generated by the secondlocal clock generation circuit relative to a clock generated by thefirst local clock generation circuit.
 22. The method of claim 21 whereinthe first local clock generator and the second local clock generatorgenerate clocks from a common reference clock.
 23. The method of claim14 wherein communicating from the first instrument to the secondinstrument comprises communicating over a network comprising a pluralityof serial lines connected to a router.
 24. The method of claim 14wherein: a) establishing a common time reference comprises: i)identifying a time relative to a time derived from the timing circuit onthe first instrument; ii) using a first portion of the identified timeto generate a time value; iii) storing a second portion of theidentified time; and b) the method further comprises sending a secondmessage from the first instrument to the second instrument, the secondmessage comprising a second time value derived from a time from thetiming circuit in the first instrument offset by the stored secondportion of the time value.
 25. The method of claim 14 whereincommunicating from the first instrument to the second instrumentcomprises transmitting packets from the first instrument to the second,each packet comprising a plurality of fields.
 26. The method of claim 14wherein the plurality of fields comprise at least a command field and atime stamp field.
 27. The method of claim 26 wherein the plurality offields further comprise a destination field.
 28. The method of claim 27wherein communicating from the first instrument to the second instrumentcomprises inserting in the destination field a destination ID of thesecond instrument.
 29. The method of claim 27 wherein communicating fromthe first instrument to the second instrument comprises inserting in thedestination field a destination ID corresponding to a first patterngroup and the message is communicated to at least a third instrument inthe first pattern group.
 30. The method of claim 29 additionallycomprising communicating from a fourth instrument to a plurality ofinstruments in a second pattern group.
 31. The method of claim 27wherein communicating from the first instrument to the second instrumentcomprises inserting in the destination field a broadcast ID.